- Joined
- Jan 15, 2023
- Messages
- 2,064
- Solutions
- 4
- Reaction score
- 1,534
- Points
- 113
- Deals
- 1
@G.Patton I have some issues with this process that I hope you can explain to me.
There is no mention of D-meth-D-tartate or l-meth-l-tartate. These are the optically active stereoisomers and I've seen no evidence or mechanism that suggests these do not form. Being the optically active stereoisomers, the would crystallize at a higher temperature ( ie sooner) than the inactive ones. The order would go: D,D; L,L; D,L; L,D.
Why would it NOT be more cost effective and efficacious to use JUST l-tartaric acid, the natural occurring isomers, and remove the ,l l-meth crystals from the rm before concentrating and crystallization?
There is no mention of D-meth-D-tartate or l-meth-l-tartate. These are the optically active stereoisomers and I've seen no evidence or mechanism that suggests these do not form. Being the optically active stereoisomers, the would crystallize at a higher temperature ( ie sooner) than the inactive ones. The order would go: D,D; L,L; D,L; L,D.
Why would it NOT be more cost effective and efficacious to use JUST l-tartaric acid, the natural occurring isomers, and remove the ,l l-meth crystals from the rm before concentrating and crystallization?
G.Patton
Expert
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2021
- Messages
- 3,073
- Solutions
- 3
- Reaction score
- 3,520
- Points
- 113
- Deals
- 1